Lawyers for Molly Martens make new claims in Corbett murder case — (

SSRI Ed note: Wife claims that husband on alcohol & Trazodone, attacked her in a rage, she + Dad killed him in self-defence. Jury rejects possibility, she gets 25 years.

To view original article click here

By Darren Hassett, Evoke Staff


Lawyers for Molly Martens claim her husband was drunk and on antidepressants, which caused him to fly into a violent rage on the night he was killed.

Ms Martens, 32, and her father Thomas Martens, 65, are charged with second-degree murder and voluntary manslaughter of Limerick man Jason Corbett last August.

The father-of-two was bludgeoned to death with a baseball bat and a paving stone at his North Carolina home, a postmortem showed.

Molly Martens’ lawyers claim her husband Jason was drunk and on antidepressants.  Pic:John Cogill

He died at his home in the early hours of August 2 and a 911 call reporting the incident was made by Mr Martens at 3.04am.

Ms Martens, a former model, and her retired FBI agent father pleaded not guilty to the charges, claiming they acted in self-defence.

An ABC report in the US this week said the defence were claiming the medical autopsy report had found traces of an antidepressant drug in the father of two’s system.

The autopsy report did find that Mr Corbett had a blood alcohol content of 0.02%, below the legal limit of 0.08% for the state.

His toxicology report also showed traces of Trazodone – less than 0.50mg – a drug used to treat depression and in some cases prescribed to treat Bipolar.

Molly Martens’ lawyers have claimed Jason was physically abusive

Walter Holton, attorney for Ms Martens, said: ‘The medical examiner report indicates that some 30 hours after his death they drew the blood and that blood had an alcohol content of 0.02% but it’s not indicative of what the content of his blood would have been on the night that this incident happened.’

The examination of Mr Corbett’s body was carried out on August 3 at 10.05am at the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner in the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services.

Mr Holton told ABC: ‘[Mr Corbett] was violent that night, what caused that, whether alcohol contributed to that or whether a drug contributed to that is for experts to opine about.

‘There will be testimony of witnesses about their relationship but anyone who chokes their wife at three o’clock in the morning to the point where a 911 call ensues, that is what I call physically abusive,’ he added.

Speaking to previously Molly Martens lawyer David Freedman said Molly had been on ‘antidepressants’ when she was very young but had ‘not been on medications for years and years.’

It followed allegations by Molly’s sister in law Tracey Lynch in court filings after her brother’s death that Molly had been ‘diagnosed with bipolar disorder from a young age, and claimed the children’s stepmother left her lithium medication lying around, and also suffered from other medical conditions.’

Ms Martens, a former model, and her retired FBI agent father Thomas claim they acted in self defence

The father and daughter were each released on bonds of $200,000 in January and were ordered to surrender their passports and not have any contact with Jason Cor­bett’s family including his children, Jack and Sarah.

The case is due back in court in May.

After a lengthy custody battle last year, Jack and Sarah, the children of Mr Corbett and his late first wife Mags, are in the care of their father’s sister Tracey Lynch and her husband David.

At an administrative hearing earlier this month at Davidson County Superior Court, Walter Hol­ton, said Molly was being threatened via social media.

He said people from the Justice For Jason page on Facebook have extended threats to Ms Martens’s uncle and aunt, Mike and Mona Earnest.

The Martens’s lawyers also said that when they attempted to contact the family of Jason’s first wife, the family said they could not speak with attorneys because it would violate the court order.

Judge Kevin Bridges clarified that the court order only applies to Ms Martens.

A US judge this week also granted a stay on a court order that would have forced the return of several belongings taken from Jason Corbett’s home by his wife Molly after attorneys filed an appeal, which could be heard next month or June this year.

The murder trial is not expected to begin until the end of this year or early next year.


Guilty: Molly Corbett and Thomas Martens handed 20 to 25 year prison sentences — (The

The jury returned its verdicts this afternoon after beginning deliberations yesterday.

 Molly Corbett and Thomas Michael Martens. Source: Davidson County Sheriff’s Office

MOLLY CORBETT AND her father, Thomas Martens, have been found guilty of the second-degree murder of Corbett’s husband, Jason Corbett, in North Carolina in August 2015.

Both have been handed 20- to 25-year prison sentences.

The jury delivered its guilty verdict this afternoon after being sent out to begin deliberations yesterday.

Molly Corbett and Thomas Martens had claimed the Limerick father-of-two was choking Molly Corbett and threatening to kill her, and that they acted in self-defence.

Second-degree murder is defined in US law as a deliberate but not premeditated murder.

David Freedman and Walter Holton, lawyers for Martens and Molly Corbett, said they will appeal the decision.

Martens chose not to speak before his sentencing, but for the first time in court, Molly Corbett made a statement as she struggled through tears.

“I did not murder my husband,” Molly Corbett said before the judge announced her sentence.

My father did not murder my husband. The incidents of 2 August happened as they happened on a somewhat regular basis. The only difference is my father was there.

The judge later recommended that Molly Corbett seek psychiatric and psychological help while in prison.

The jury panel, three men and nine women, spent two weeks listening to 21 testimonies and more than 200 pieces of evidence from law enforcement, paramedics, specialised analysts, coworkers of Martens, Molly Corbett’s neighbour and, of course, Martens.

It took over a week for the prosecution and defence to narrow a pool of 143 people to 12 seated jurors and two alternates.

The verdict comes two years and a week after Martens and Molly Corbett killed Jason Corbett with an aluminum baseball bat and a paving stone.

Jason Corbett Source: Facebook


As the verdict was announced, tears of relief streamed down the faces of the Corbett family, while tears of distress washed over the Martens family. Molly Corbett slumped in her chair and began whimpering as her verdict was announced while Martens remained stoic. Many jurors were consumed with emotion as the clerk confirmed each jurors’ verdict.

As she was handcuffed following the verdict, a tearful Molly Corbett said to her mother, Sharon Martens, ”I’m really sorry, mom. I wish they’d just kill me”.

Martens and Molly Corbett claimed Jason Corbett was choking Molly Corbett and threatening to kill her, and they acted in self-defence.

Investigators cast doubt on that defence. Authorities said Jason Corbett was planning to leave Molly Corbett, his second wife and former nanny to his children, and return to Ireland.

Tom Aamland, the jury’s foreperson, said the preliminary vote yesterday was split. He said that for Martens, the originally vote count was 12-0 for second-degree murder. For Molly Corbett, it was 10-2 for second-degree murder. He stated that no juror leaned toward not guilty.

Aamland said two jurors weren’t sure, but then they came to their own conclusion overnight. He said the group took a another vote today and it was unanimous for both Molly Corbett and Martens.


In reference to Martens’ testimony, Aamland said the “I don’t knows” and memory of Martens raised suspicion from the jury.

He added that the first question by all the jurors was why there was a brick on Molly Corbett’s night stand — which was never answered during trial. He said the jurors felt Molly Corbett could’ve gotten out of the situation, but she chose to stay.

The foreperson said he felt confident that the jury reached the correct verdict.

“There are no winners in this case,” Aamland said.

“Everybody loses to some degree…Nobody should take any joy in this verdict.”