To view original article click here
San Francisco Weekly
By Matt Smith
Wednesday, Apr 29 2009
Three years ago, Linda Woo, then 39, woke her two children in the middle of the night, wrapped them in blankets, and put them in a borrowed Subaru Outback with their stuffed animals. She placed a lit barbecue grill on the front seat. A family friend found the trio huddled in the backseat in the morning. Woo and her 4-year-old son were groggy, but alive. However, her daughter, 3-year-old Olive Woo Murphy, died of carbon monoxide poisoning from the charcoal fumes.
At the time, I wrote a column in which I noted that Olive had been my daughter’s preschool playmate. I interviewed psychologists and child abuse experts to make the speculative case that ordinary parenting stress might have driven Linda Woo over the edge. I urged readers to reach out to parents they perceived might be in need of help.
But according to testimony and arguments heard at Woo’s murder trial earlier this month — in which she pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity — the facts of the case suggest something more troubling than the horror of a stressed-out mother killing her child.
This did not seem to be a situation where Woo simply lost the fight to cope that all parents find themselves in. Rather, she had become so obsessed with a years-long, recently reignited illicit love affair with a young photographer and musician that his decision to break it off threw her into a suicidal depression. In concluding that she couldn’t stand life without her lover, Woo also decided her children would be better off dead than having to live without her. The Outback belonged to the object of her obsession, Eric Embry; she’d taken the car from him the night before. To protect its upholstery, Assistant District Attorney Marshall Khine said, she laid down a towel before placing the grill in the car. “Clearly, she was sending [Embry] a message,” says Stuart Hanlon, Woo’s defense attorney. “She tells her doctors that dying would have brought them back together after death. That’s a pretty nutty view.”
Police found suicide notes to Woo’s estranged husband and other family members, and one to Embry complaining that he hadn’t called her. Phone records showed she had called him 55 times the day before.
Learning the bizarre, Fatal Attraction–like details surrounding Linda Woo’s act at first gave me a sense of relief: She’s not like the rest of us after all, I found myself thinking. But I was wrong. It was sparked by a confluence of individual circumstances many can understand, which included depression, extreme motherly attachment, heartbreak, and a delusional attempt at a solution.
Listening to several days of further testimony at trial, reading books on filicide and the insanity defense, and interviewing legal and psychiatric experts on women who kill their children — yes, there really is such a specialty — I learned that Woo’s confounding act is common enough to occupy a place in medical literature.
“That’s one of the hallmarks here: In their crazed state, they start to think the only way to take care of the children is to take them with them,” said Michelle Oberman, professor of law at Santa Clara University, who has written several books and papers on mothers who kill their children.
“The mother becomes suicidal and decides to kill her children to save them from the agony of growing up without her,” said Geoffrey McKee, a psychiatry professor at the University of South Carolina School of Medicine, and author of Why Mothers Kill: A Forensic Psychologist’s Casebook. “Whether that’s realistic or not – whether that’s rational or not — that’s another matter.”
Once upon a time, Linda Woo seemed an unlikely suicide, let alone murderer. She was an international-level competitor in Gaelic football, a variation of soccer that allows the limited use of hands. She traveled and socialized with a group of fellow athletes, one of several overlapping social circles made up of her admirers. She was the vivacious, wisecracking hub of a dozen always-in-touch friends. She threw herself so fully into mothering her two preschool-age children that she inspired one of her constant companions to become a parent herself.
In May 2005, friends learned that Woo had separated from her husband; five months later, she guiltily admitted to her closest friends that she’d had a long-term affair with a younger man.
Woo was a publicist for PG&E in 2001 when she met Embry, who had been hired by the utility to conduct a photo shoot. Their affair blossomed when he moved to San Francisco in 2004. Woo believed she’d found her soul mate and that she’d discovered true intimacy for the first time, despite having been married for two decades.
But in the fall of 2005, Embry ended the affair. Woo slipped from being the animated life of an endless party to a wan, unusually thin, slump-shouldered fraction of herself, friends testified at trial. She also confided personal feelings in a way she never had before: “She said if it wasn’t for her kids, she wouldn’t have a reason to live,” one close pal recalled before breaking down in sobs on the stand, compelling the judge to order a recess.
On March 22, 2006, at a dinner party with their group of friends, Linda greeted Rebecca Clark, a U.S. Department of Labor investigator who considered Woo a personal mentor, with a disturbing announcement. “The first thing out of her mouth was, ‘I have a way to do it, Becky,'” Clark testified. By “it,” Woo meant suicide. Woo’s friends then put her on a home-crafted version of suicide watch, with one of them staying overnight with her most of the time.
During the trial, Hanlon asked Clark if she’d thought to ask about Woo’s children. “That never crossed my mind,” Clark said. “Linda loved them so much. She would have died for those children.”
The law and psychology are awkward companions. Where a psychiatrist might ask what sort of disorder would motivate a woman to kill her children, the law poses a question drawn from Roman times: Did the killer have a “guilty mind”? There exists no medical measure of this sort of “insanity” — it’s a purely legal creation.
“None of us can understand the jurisprudence of the insanity defense,” Oberman says. “It seems to be a part of a social need to vilify certain acts and excuse others.”
Filicide, in particular, has a peculiar place in society’s struggle with what’s moral and what’s not. Current laws in countries such as Great Britain and Canada acknowledge that a woman who becomes so despairing that she kills her child during its first two years of life might not otherwise be a murderer. “These infanticide laws allow for mitigation in mothers who kill their children,” McKee said. “This is kind of a societal acknowledgement of the special stresses that fall upon mothers.”
For a year prior to Olive’s death, Woo had been seeing a therapist for severe depression. She had been prescribed the antidepression medication Lexapro, but had stopped taking it.
By January 2006, Woo’s therapist feared she was suicidal, Hanlon said. By March, lovesickness seemed to have transformed Woo’s severe depression into deranged obsession.
During the days before her daughter’s death, Woo conducted at least 40 Internet searches on the subject of carbon monoxide poisoning. She took her children on a shopping trip to Target, where she bought a small charcoal grill and a carbon monoxide detector.
According to Gilbert Villela, a psychiatrist who treated Woo while she was incarcerated at San Francisco’s General Hospital, she was still wishing for a response from Embry two weeks after she was arrested. “I thought she was one of the most severely depressed patients I’d ever seen,” Villela said.
(Woo’s husband has filed a lawsuit against her therapist, based on the notion that he should have known enough about Woo’s illness to have intervened to prevent her from attempting suicide and killing one of her children.)
On April 21, a jury convicted Woo of murdering her daughter. The verdict marked the close of the first phase of a two-part trial, in which jurors next heard evidence to determine whether she was insane at the time of her actions. Jurors are expected to decide some time around the week before Mother’s Day whether Woo’s severe depression constituted legal insanity. If they deem her insane, she could be sent to a state mental hospital instead of prison.
For McKee, author of the clinicians’ guide to mothers who kill children, these types of cases contain a lesson regardless of verdict: The most important question to ask mothers who start talking about suicide, McKee says, is, “What are your plans for the children?”
To view original article click here
Linda Woo gets 25 to life for killing daughter
Justin Berton, Chronicle Staff Writer
Thursday, November 26, 2009
A San Francisco woman who asphyxiated her 3-year-old daughter during an apparent suicide attempt in their Ingleside Terrace home has been sentenced to 25 years to life in prison.
Linda Woo, 43, was sentenced Tuesday in San Francisco Superior Court by Judge Cynthia Ming-Mei Lee for first-degree murder. Woo will serve a concurrent term of seven years to life for the attempted murder of her 4-year-old son, who survived the incident.
On March 29, 2006, Woo was found inside a car in her garage with her two unconscious children. The daughter, Olive Murphy, was pronounced dead at the scene, and the boy suffered brain injuries.
According to prosecutors, Woo told the children they were going on a camping trip, led them into the car in the garage and lit a portable barbecue.
Prosecutors said Woo had been trying to get back at a man who broke off an affair with her while she was still married to the children’s father.
When Woo didn’t bring the children to day care, the school contacted her estranged husband. He called friends, one of whom discovered the mother and children in the garage at 370 Moncada Way and phoned 911.
Woo, who worked as a principal project manager at Pacific Gas and Electric Co. in San Francisco, was treated for carbon monoxide poisoning.
At the trial, Woo’s therapist testified that she suffered from depression and had talked repeatedly about committing suicide after stopping her medication.
Woo’s attorney argued that Woo grappled with a “major depressive disorder” that was so severe she was not responsible for her acts.
A San Francisco jury convicted her in April and rejected Woo’s claims the following month that she had been insane at the time of the incident.
E-mail Justin Berton at email@example.com.
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/11/25/BA7L1AQAUU.DTL&tsp=1#ixzz0Y6uEMyLv